<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Trade Deficit Drive Inequality?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ourfuture.org/20130108/trade-deficit-and-inequality/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ourfuture.org/20130108/trade-deficit-and-inequality?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=trade-deficit-and-inequality</link>
	<description>Daily news and strategy from a progressive point of view.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:21:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Johnson: DC Should Talk About Fixing the Trade Deficit &#124; Hot News</title>
		<link>http://blog.ourfuture.org/20130108/trade-deficit-and-inequality#comment-54045</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Johnson: DC Should Talk About Fixing the Trade Deficit &#124; Hot News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ourfuture.org/?p=83754#comment-54045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] people on both sides of the trade border instead of pushing terrible and increasing worldwide inequality. They could have lifted environmental protections on both sides of trade borders. They could have [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] people on both sides of the trade border instead of pushing terrible and increasing worldwide inequality. They could have lifted environmental protections on both sides of trade borders. They could have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: test &#124; Seeing the Forest</title>
		<link>http://blog.ourfuture.org/20130108/trade-deficit-and-inequality#comment-53545</link>
		<dc:creator>test &#124; Seeing the Forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 03:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ourfuture.org/?p=83754#comment-53545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Those trade agreements could have had different terms that lead to different results that lifted working people on both sides of the trade border instead of pushing terrible and increasing worldwide inequality. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Those trade agreements could have had different terms that lead to different results that lifted working people on both sides of the trade border instead of pushing terrible and increasing worldwide inequality. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 40% of Americans Now Make Less than 1968 Minimum Wage &#171; limitless life</title>
		<link>http://blog.ourfuture.org/20130108/trade-deficit-and-inequality#comment-50205</link>
		<dc:creator>40% of Americans Now Make Less than 1968 Minimum Wage &#171; limitless life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ourfuture.org/?p=83754#comment-50205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Does Trade Deficit Drive Inequality?: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Trade Deficit Drive Inequality?: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 40% Of Americans Now Make Less Than 1968 Minimum Wage &#124; Seeing the Forest</title>
		<link>http://blog.ourfuture.org/20130108/trade-deficit-and-inequality#comment-50195</link>
		<dc:creator>40% Of Americans Now Make Less Than 1968 Minimum Wage &#124; Seeing the Forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ourfuture.org/?p=83754#comment-50195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Does Trade Deficit Drive Inequality?: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Trade Deficit Drive Inequality?: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reporters: Ask About The TRADE Deficit &#124; Seeing the Forest</title>
		<link>http://blog.ourfuture.org/20130108/trade-deficit-and-inequality#comment-47465</link>
		<dc:creator>Reporters: Ask About The TRADE Deficit &#124; Seeing the Forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 01:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ourfuture.org/?p=83754#comment-47465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Does Trade Deficit Drive Inequality? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Trade Deficit Drive Inequality? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If You Want To Reform Something, Reform The Trade Agreements &#124; Seeing the Forest</title>
		<link>http://blog.ourfuture.org/20130108/trade-deficit-and-inequality#comment-44634</link>
		<dc:creator>If You Want To Reform Something, Reform The Trade Agreements &#124; Seeing the Forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ourfuture.org/?p=83754#comment-44634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Those trade agreements could have had different terms that lead to different results that lifted working people on both sides of the trade border instead of pushing terrible and increasing worldwide inequality. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Those trade agreements could have had different terms that lead to different results that lifted working people on both sides of the trade border instead of pushing terrible and increasing worldwide inequality. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Wilkin</title>
		<link>http://blog.ourfuture.org/20130108/trade-deficit-and-inequality#comment-37346</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Wilkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ourfuture.org/?p=83754#comment-37346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zero comments?  Last time there was one, plus mine &quot;waiting for moderation.&quot;  Now there are zero?  No discussion wanted here, apparently.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zero comments?  Last time there was one, plus mine &#8220;waiting for moderation.&#8221;  Now there are zero?  No discussion wanted here, apparently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Wilkin</title>
		<link>http://blog.ourfuture.org/20130108/trade-deficit-and-inequality#comment-35477</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Wilkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ourfuture.org/?p=83754#comment-35477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The trade deficit AND growing income inequality are both symptoms of the abandonment of patriotism by American policy-makers and by the executives of multinational corporations.

No longer do the Presidents or Congress act in the interests of the American people, nor even the larger national interest conceived as our industrial system. Instead it is private profits and private wealth accumulation that drive all economic policy.

It goes back further than Reagan, not necessarily as conscious sell-out in the beginning, but certainly as the results become more exaggerated and incontrovertible, we can only call its continuation a complete sell-out of the American people. It could be said to go back to Nixon’s era, when liberalization of trade was seen as the way for US-based multinational corporations to make maximum benefit of the rise of other countries as growing markets. Import quotas and other import controls were being abandoned in order to make diplomatic gains on other issues, such as geo-strategic alliances. The thinking underneath it was that by leading the world in this new liberalized trade policy, other countries would follow.

Well, despite the subsequent creation of the WTO and many FTAs, it hasn’t worked out that way. Instead America has a wide open market while other countries have a host of import controls and govt-business partnerships that serve their national interests. This is in stark contrast to American policy that is made by Republican and Democratic parties funded by the 1% in service of the 1%, who have staked their future with the profitability of multinational corporations rather than the fate of our nation.

And so America is flooded with cheap imports that are more profitable to the corporations, enriching the 1% at the cost to the nation of offshoring our jobs, factories, GDP, tax base, and worst of all, our ability to make wealth in the future. Now that Presidential election campaigns cost over a $billion, and Congressional campaigns can go into many tens of millions, we see that these are crumbs compared to the $Trillions accumulating at the top, even as ordinary Americans are losing jobs, houses, real wages, savings, and hope.

That same greed and sell-out of the nation by the super-rich and their political puppets in Washington explains why the wealthy have enjoyed such a tax holiday for decades (relative not only to other developed nations but also to our own past) and an underinvestment in infrastructure and science and R&amp;D.

And of course that same greed that off-shored America’s engines of wealth creation has now exploited our resulting economic crisis to advance their permanent agenda to dismantle Social Security and all other social spending.

The trade deficits are just one more symptom of the smash-and-grab looting of America by the 1%, who pushed for and got the deregulation of the financial sector so they could make bubble economies enriching themselves on commissions and fees and then, after gambling with the money of ordinary small investors and working class mortgage payers, when their bubbles pop they get $Trillions in bailouts while crying for cuts to SS payments to the poorest Americans.

There will be no solutions until Washington DC can be made to serve the national interest, ie, the American people and our collective future as an economy and society, instead of the 1%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trade deficit AND growing income inequality are both symptoms of the abandonment of patriotism by American policy-makers and by the executives of multinational corporations.</p>
<p>No longer do the Presidents or Congress act in the interests of the American people, nor even the larger national interest conceived as our industrial system. Instead it is private profits and private wealth accumulation that drive all economic policy.</p>
<p>It goes back further than Reagan, not necessarily as conscious sell-out in the beginning, but certainly as the results become more exaggerated and incontrovertible, we can only call its continuation a complete sell-out of the American people. It could be said to go back to Nixon’s era, when liberalization of trade was seen as the way for US-based multinational corporations to make maximum benefit of the rise of other countries as growing markets. Import quotas and other import controls were being abandoned in order to make diplomatic gains on other issues, such as geo-strategic alliances. The thinking underneath it was that by leading the world in this new liberalized trade policy, other countries would follow.</p>
<p>Well, despite the subsequent creation of the WTO and many FTAs, it hasn’t worked out that way. Instead America has a wide open market while other countries have a host of import controls and govt-business partnerships that serve their national interests. This is in stark contrast to American policy that is made by Republican and Democratic parties funded by the 1% in service of the 1%, who have staked their future with the profitability of multinational corporations rather than the fate of our nation.</p>
<p>And so America is flooded with cheap imports that are more profitable to the corporations, enriching the 1% at the cost to the nation of offshoring our jobs, factories, GDP, tax base, and worst of all, our ability to make wealth in the future. Now that Presidential election campaigns cost over a $billion, and Congressional campaigns can go into many tens of millions, we see that these are crumbs compared to the $Trillions accumulating at the top, even as ordinary Americans are losing jobs, houses, real wages, savings, and hope.</p>
<p>That same greed and sell-out of the nation by the super-rich and their political puppets in Washington explains why the wealthy have enjoyed such a tax holiday for decades (relative not only to other developed nations but also to our own past) and an underinvestment in infrastructure and science and R&amp;D.</p>
<p>And of course that same greed that off-shored America’s engines of wealth creation has now exploited our resulting economic crisis to advance their permanent agenda to dismantle Social Security and all other social spending.</p>
<p>The trade deficits are just one more symptom of the smash-and-grab looting of America by the 1%, who pushed for and got the deregulation of the financial sector so they could make bubble economies enriching themselves on commissions and fees and then, after gambling with the money of ordinary small investors and working class mortgage payers, when their bubbles pop they get $Trillions in bailouts while crying for cuts to SS payments to the poorest Americans.</p>
<p>There will be no solutions until Washington DC can be made to serve the national interest, ie, the American people and our collective future as an economy and society, instead of the 1%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Trade Deficit Drive Inequality? &#8211; Trade Reform</title>
		<link>http://blog.ourfuture.org/20130108/trade-deficit-and-inequality#comment-33997</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Trade Deficit Drive Inequality? &#8211; Trade Reform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ourfuture.org/?p=83754#comment-33997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Does Trade Deficit Drive Inequality? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Trade Deficit Drive Inequality? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Warren</title>
		<link>http://blog.ourfuture.org/20130108/trade-deficit-and-inequality#comment-32570</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 01:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ourfuture.org/?p=83754#comment-32570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Economy seems to be a closed system of finite scope that can only support a certain level of wealth and when it flows all into the 1% there&#039;s not much good left to share!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Economy seems to be a closed system of finite scope that can only support a certain level of wealth and when it flows all into the 1% there&#8217;s not much good left to share!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 409/414 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Windows Azure Storage: caf.blob.core.windows.net
Application Monitoring using New Relic

 Served from: blog.ourfuture.org @ 2013-05-24 20:50:11 by W3 Total Cache -->